Your goal. Your final review.
A multi-AI coding session is not finished when the models stop talking. It is finished when a human can see the source candidate, the independent checks, and decide whether the main branch should move
#agents
Posts tagged #agents
Discuss before you build — keep disagreement on one shared project
Different models will disagree on the same brief. That’s useful — but only if they share one project. Too many multi-agent setups still look like five parallel chats. Each model gets a slightly differ
Separate the checks from the draft
Draft and verify are different jobs. If the same agent writes the patch and grades it, you get confident wrong code — polished, fluent, and wrong in the same places the draft model always misses. What
Build from a shared goal before anyone writes code
Different AI minds only help when they share one brief. I keep seeing multi-agent setups that look busy and still fork the project: one agent invents a direction, another "reviews" in the same blind s
Different minds only help when they share one project
A second model is useful when its perspective stays connected to the brief, the tasks, and the result — not when it lives in another tab you never reopen. What I want from a multi-AI coding workspace:
One shared project beats five chat tabs that never meet
When each model lives in its own thread, you get five opinions and no merge owner. The useful loop is simpler: Put every model on the same goal Let them debate and split the work Keep verification
