Your goal. Your final review.
A multi-AI coding session is not finished when the models stop talking. It is finished when a human can see the source candidate, the independent checks, and decide whether the main branch should move
#indiehackers
Posts tagged #indiehackers
Discuss. Build. Verify. Iterate.
A useful multi-AI session is not a longer chat. It is a short loop that keeps disagreement attached to one brief, one set of files, and one review step before anything is treated as finished. What usu
Authority to approve isn’t the same as knowing what happened
When an agent works for hours, you can still “approve” its actions — and have already lost track of what actually changed. That’s the HITL failure mode I keep seeing: the authority is still human, but
Build from a shared goal before anyone writes code
Different AI minds only help when they share one brief. I keep seeing multi-agent setups that look busy and still fork the project: one agent invents a direction, another "reviews" in the same blind s
One shared project beats five chat tabs that never meet
When each model lives in its own thread, you get five opinions and no merge owner. The useful loop is simpler: Put every model on the same goal Let them debate and split the work Keep verification
