Discuss. Build. Verify. Iterate.

A useful multi-AI session is not a longer chat.

It is a short loop that keeps disagreement attached to one brief, one set of files, and one review step before anything is treated as finished.

What usually breaks

Most “multi-agent” demos fan out early:

• one agent writes
• another rewrites
• a third summarizes

Then nobody can say which version is the source of truth.

The failure mode is not model quality. It is missing ownership of the handoff.

A tighter loop

1. Discuss — several models argue the brief against the same constraints.
2. Build — coding tasks stay tied to that shared goal.
3. Verify — independent checks sit apart from the draft that produced the code.
4. Iterate — export the source, open the files, ask for the next change without restarting from a blank chat.

Publishing to the project main branch stays an explicit human approval step.

What we are not selling

Brainstorm is a BYOK shell. You bring your own eligible model accounts. Platform licensing and provider usage stay separate. We do not sell model credits.

Linux has the release path we can stand behind today. Windows remains a preview.

If you are building with multiple coding agents and keep losing the thread between “good discussion” and “reviewable files,” that is the gap this workflow is meant to close.